Bacterial and Viral Coinfection in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients

The Prevalence and Possible Role in Disease Progression

Mohsen Moghoofei; Shayan Mostafaei; Nasim Kondori; Michelle E. Armstrong; Farhad Babaei

Disclosures

BMC Pulm Med. 2022;22(60) 

In This Article

Background

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal interstitial lung disease with a mean survival rate of less than 3 years. The prevalence of IPF is estimated at up to 29 cases per 100,000, with the incidence and associated mortality currently increasing.[1,2] Many risk factors have been implicated in the etiology of IPF including inhaled toxins, smoking and infectious disease.[3,4] However, the specific mechanisms underlying IPF pathogenesis or disease progression are unknown.

Extensive research has demonstrated a role for a number of viruses in initiation and progression of clinical disease in IPF. Previous research has demonstrated a role of viruses in initiation and progression of clinical disease in IPF.[5–9] Previously, we demonstrated the presence of parainfluenza, RSV, rhinovirus and coronavirus in nasopharyngeal (NPL) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from IPF patients.[4] However, we did not investigate the impact of these viruses on pulmonary function in IPF patients. The similarities in clinical and radiologic presentation between pneumonitis related to viral infection and acute exacerbation of IPF (AE-IPF) in patients illustrates the key role of viruses in the pathogenesis of IPF.[10]

More recently, a role for bacterial infection has been described in the pathogenesis of IPF. Studies have demonstrated that IPF patients have an increased bacterial load in BAL fluid compared with healthy individuals or COPD patients.[11,12] Furthermore, it has been shown that IPF patients with an increased bacterial load in their BAL fluid at diagnosis have a significantly increased mortality risk.[11] Bacterial species such as Strepococcus, Veillonella, Haemophillus and Neisseria have been found at increased frequencies the the BAL fluid of IPF patients.[11] Recently, bacterial infection has also been implicated in disease progression during acute exacerbations in IPF (AE-IPF).[13]

In this study, we investigated the prevalence and impact of bacterial and viral co-infection in a cohort of IPF patients (n = 67) in the context of pulmonary function [forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1) and diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO)], disease status and mortality risk. Specifically, we determined the prevalence of: (1) six significant respiratory viral infections in IPF including influenza, parainfluenza, adenovirus, rhinovirus, coronavirus and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV); (2) the prevalence of five respiratory bacterial infections including Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae), Staphlococcus aureus (S. aureus), Klebseilla pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) and Haemophilus influenza (H. influenza) and (3) we also investigated the incidence of co-infection with bacteria and viruses. Using principal component analysis (PCA), we investigated the relationship between and distribution of bacterial and viral co-infection in the IPF cohort.

processing....