Discussion
Among adults hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection at a single hospital in California during the Omicron-predominant period (December 21, 2021–January 27, 2022), COVID-19 vaccination, particularly receipt of a booster dose, was associated with lower likelihood of ICU admission, and, among adults aged ≥65 years, lower likelihood of death while hospitalized. Compared with the period of Delta predominance, a higher proportion of adults hospitalized during Omicron predominance were fully vaccinated. Consistent with earlier findings,[3] Omicron-period hospitalizations were associated with a lower likelihood of ICU admission, IMV, and death while hospitalized, compared with Delta-period hospitalizations. However, the proportion requiring ICU admission and IMV did not differ significantly when stratified by vaccination status, suggesting that much of the lower disease severity observed during Omicron predominance might be driven by increased population-level vaccine-conferred immunity. These findings support the continued importance of COVID-19 vaccination, including booster doses, in mitigating the risk of severe illness associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
From mid-July through mid-December 2021, the proportion of fully vaccinated adults in Los Angeles County increased nearly 20%, from approximately 65% to 77%,*** but the proportion of SARS-CoV-2 hospitalizations occurring in fully vaccinated adults increased almost 60%, from approximately 25% to 40%. The increase in the percentage of fully vaccinated Hispanic adults and the decrease in the percentage of non-Hispanic White adults hospitalized between the two periods likely reflect increased vaccination coverage among Hispanic persons during fall 2021. Increases in infections among vaccinated persons during the period of Omicron predominance were likely driven both by waning vaccine-derived immunity over time and by relative resistance to vaccine neutralization in the Omicron variant compared with the Delta variant.[2,4] This is consistent with the observed decline in effectiveness of 2-dose vaccination against COVID-19 hospitalization during the Omicron period.[5] A previous study also found that, compared with the period of Delta predominance, the period of Omicron predominance in Los Angeles County was associated with a decrease in the degree of protection against COVID-19 and hospitalization.[6] Despite this, COVID-19 vaccination, including a booster dose, was associated with lower likelihood of ICU admission during the Omicron period, and lower likelihood of death among adults aged ≥65 years, who are at higher risk for severe outcomes when hospitalized with COVID-19.[7,8]
Early reports suggest that the Omicron variant has lower replication competence in lung parenchyma,†††,§§§ possibly contributing to a decreased severity of illness compared with earlier variants.[3] However, among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 during the early Omicron predominant period, most had lower respiratory symptoms and abnormal chest imaging, approximately one third had hypoxemia, and 10% required IMV. These findings demonstrate that, despite observed changes compared with Delta, Omicron variant infection still causes severe lower respiratory illness. Similar data on patient symptoms were not available for Delta-period hospitalizations. However, fewer Omicron-period patients received COVID-19-directed therapies, which might suggest lower proportion with hypoxemia, compared with Delta-period patients. Alternatively, this change might have been driven by changes in prescribing practices or other unmeasured factors.
Approximately 20% of SARS-CoV-2 admissions during early Omicron predominance were likely for reasons other than COVID-19, a proportion even higher among young and vaccinated adults. Given high rates of SARS-CoV-2 community transmission, this is not unexpected. This estimate stands in contrast to an estimated 63% of patients admitted with incidental SARS-CoV-2 infection reported from South Africa.[9] While this difference might be driven, in part, by differences in demographics and population immunity, the present study's classification methodology might have overestimated the number of persons whose admission was driven by COVID-19. One third of patients classified as having been admitted for COVID-19 received no COVID-19–directed therapies. Alternatively, high population-level immunity from vaccination, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, or both might have modulated the clinical presentation of patients with COVID-19 during Omicron predominance and atypical presentations might have been underrecognized (e.g., exacerbations of chronic medical conditions), or lesser illness severity might have resulted in fewer therapies. However, the pandemic health care burden is not limited to hospitalizations for symptomatic COVID-19. Even patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results admitted for non-COVID-19 conditions require isolation rooms and use of personal protective equipment and might transmit infection to health care workers, exacerbating staff shortages.
The findings in this report are subject to at least six limitations. First, sequencing data were not available to identify the SARS-CoV-2 variant. However, based on California genomic surveillance data, which is based on sequencing of ≥10% of all positive RT-PCR tests in the state,¶¶¶ and on recent genomic surveillance for Los Angeles County,[7] the Delta and Omicron variants accounted for the majority of sequenced isolates throughout their respective predominance periods. Second, the proportion of Omicron-period hospitalizations attributed to COVID-19 could not be compared with earlier periods, so it is unclear whether the proportion represented a change from an earlier period. Third, the study might have been underpowered to detect Omicron-specific reductions in illness severity after stratifying by vaccination status. Fourth, the analysis could not account for the interval since the last dose of COVID-19 vaccine, which might have been longer among Omicron-period patients. Fifth, there might have been incomplete ascertainment of deaths in the recent weeks of Omicron predominance; severely ill patients might remain hospitalized and might be at high risk of death. A longer period of observation might have reduced differences in death between the two periods. Finally, these findings are from a single hospital in Los Angeles and cannot be generalized to the United States. However, the hospital has a large catchment area in a racially and ethnically diverse region.
In this single-hospital study, adults hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection during Omicron predominance had less severe illness compared with adults hospitalized during Delta predominance. Much of this effect appears to be driven by increased proportion of patients who were fully vaccinated. Approximately 20% of Omicron-period hospitalizations among adults with a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR result were driven by non–COVID-19 conditions, which might be attributed to high SARS-CoV-2 community transmission and high population vaccination coverage. COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower likelihood of ICU admission during Omicron predominance. COVID-19 vaccination, including a booster dose for those who are fully vaccinated, is critical to minimizing the risk for severe health outcomes among adults with COVID-19.
Acknowledgments
Keren Dunn, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Meredith McMorrow, CDC COVID-19 Emergency Response Team.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2022;71(6):217-223. © 2022 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)