Please note that the text below is not a full transcript and has not been copyedited. For more insight and commentary on these stories, subscribe to the This Week in Cardiology podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your preferred podcast provider. This podcast is intended only for healthcare professionals.
In This Week’s Podcast
For the week ending January 28, 2022, John Mandrola, MD comments on the following news and features stories.
AF Screening
This week JAMA published the latest US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) systematic review on atrial fibrillation (AF) screening. AF screening by doctors, that is. After a review of 26 studies, USPSTF found that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for AF.
USPSTF is a notable group because they are independent experts in critical appraisal. Think Neutral Martians not cardiologists looking at the evidence. USPSTF assigns grades of preventive services on an A-B-C-D-I system. For example, A = high certainty of net benefit and doctors should offer or provide the service, while D = high certainty of no net benefit and harms outweigh benefits thus doctors should not offer this service.
COMMENTARY
Jan 28, 2022 This Week in Cardiology Podcast
John M. Mandrola, MD
DisclosuresJanuary 28, 2022
Please note that the text below is not a full transcript and has not been copyedited. For more insight and commentary on these stories, subscribe to the This Week in Cardiology podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your preferred podcast provider. This podcast is intended only for healthcare professionals.
In This Week’s Podcast
For the week ending January 28, 2022, John Mandrola, MD comments on the following news and features stories.
AF Screening
USPSTF Says Evidence Still Lacking for AF Screening in Asymptomatic Patients
This week JAMA published the latest US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) systematic review on atrial fibrillation (AF) screening. AF screening by doctors, that is. After a review of 26 studies, USPSTF found that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for AF.
USPSTF is a notable group because they are independent experts in critical appraisal. Think Neutral Martians not cardiologists looking at the evidence. USPSTF assigns grades of preventive services on an A-B-C-D-I system. For example, A = high certainty of net benefit and doctors should offer or provide the service, while D = high certainty of no net benefit and harms outweigh benefits thus doctors should not offer this service.
© 2022 WebMD, LLC
Any views expressed above are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the views of WebMD or Medscape.
Cite this: Jan 28, 2022 This Week in Cardiology Podcast - Medscape - Jan 28, 2022.
Tables
Authors and Disclosures
Authors and Disclosures
Chief Cardiology Correspondent
John M. Mandrola, MD
Clinical Electrophysiologist, Baptist Medical Associates, Louisville, Kentucky
Disclosure: John M. Mandrola, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.