This transcript has been edited for clarity.
It's Mark Kris from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. I'm speaking today about a recent publication in The Lancet in the September 20, 2021, issue.
This paper details a worldwide randomized phase 3 trial comparing atezolizumab, the anti–PD-L1 drug, with no additional therapy in patients with completely resected stage II and stage IIIA lung cancers who have received postoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin and another agent.
Cisplatin-based chemotherapy after surgery in these patients is our current standard of care. This trial is a fairly clean one to address this very pertinent issue. What I like about this trial and this approach, particularly from a medical oncologist standpoint, is that the goal is to improve the cure rate.
We have the potential here to take one of our systemic agents and use it in a situation that could enhance the chance of cure. I know there is some controversy here, but to me, what's more important is the disease-free survival curve. Only those patients who get on that curve and stay on that curve can be cured. The disease-free survival curve is indeed the most important one because, to me, that's the cure curve.
This trial was designed to compare no additional treatment with 16 doses of
COMMENTARY
Is Adjuvant Atezolizumab a New Standard in Stage II/IIIA Lung Cancer?
Mark G. Kris, MD
DisclosuresDecember 01, 2021
This transcript has been edited for clarity.
It's Mark Kris from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. I'm speaking today about a recent publication in The Lancet in the September 20, 2021, issue.
This paper details a worldwide randomized phase 3 trial comparing atezolizumab, the anti–PD-L1 drug, with no additional therapy in patients with completely resected stage II and stage IIIA lung cancers who have received postoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin and another agent.
Cisplatin-based chemotherapy after surgery in these patients is our current standard of care. This trial is a fairly clean one to address this very pertinent issue. What I like about this trial and this approach, particularly from a medical oncologist standpoint, is that the goal is to improve the cure rate.
We have the potential here to take one of our systemic agents and use it in a situation that could enhance the chance of cure. I know there is some controversy here, but to me, what's more important is the disease-free survival curve. Only those patients who get on that curve and stay on that curve can be cured. The disease-free survival curve is indeed the most important one because, to me, that's the cure curve.
This trial was designed to compare no additional treatment with 16 doses of
Medscape Oncology © 2021 WebMD, LLC
Any views expressed above are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the views of WebMD or Medscape.
Cite this: Mark G. Kris. Is Adjuvant Atezolizumab a New Standard in Stage II/IIIA Lung Cancer? - Medscape - Dec 01, 2021.
Tables
Authors and Disclosures
Authors and Disclosures
Author(s)
Mark G. Kris, MD
Professor of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College; Attending Physician, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Disclosure: Mark G. Kris, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant, or trustee for: AstraZeneca; Roche/Genentech; Ariad Pharmaceuticals
Received a research grant from: Pfizer Inc; PUMA; Roche/Genentech