This transcript has been edited for clarity.
Hi. I'm Dr Anne Peters. Today, I'm going to give you some updates on the GRADE study.
Just to refresh your memory, the GRADE study was first presented at the American Diabetes Association (ADA) meetings in June, and those were the preliminary results. More of the final results were just presented at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) meeting, and in about a month or so, we'll be able to read the final manuscript. The GRADE study was designed to determine the next best therapy to add to metformin when treating an individual with type 2 diabetes.
They took individuals with type 2 diabetes on metformin alone who weren't at target. The average A1c here wasn't all that high, starting out at 7.5%. These individuals were randomized to one of four treatments, including a sulfonylurea agent, which was glimepiride; a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, sitagliptin; a glycoprotein 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, liraglutide; and insulin glargine. They then were followed, and the primary endpoint was how long it took for that combination therapy to fail. The definition of failing was an A1c ≥ 7%.
Then, if the A1c rose to > 7.5%, they were continued on what they were on, and basal
COMMENTARY
Metformin, Then What? More Findings From the GRADE Study
Anne L. Peters, MD
DisclosuresNovember 03, 2021
This transcript has been edited for clarity.
Hi. I'm Dr Anne Peters. Today, I'm going to give you some updates on the GRADE study.
Just to refresh your memory, the GRADE study was first presented at the American Diabetes Association (ADA) meetings in June, and those were the preliminary results. More of the final results were just presented at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) meeting, and in about a month or so, we'll be able to read the final manuscript. The GRADE study was designed to determine the next best therapy to add to metformin when treating an individual with type 2 diabetes.
They took individuals with type 2 diabetes on metformin alone who weren't at target. The average A1c here wasn't all that high, starting out at 7.5%. These individuals were randomized to one of four treatments, including a sulfonylurea agent, which was glimepiride; a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, sitagliptin; a glycoprotein 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, liraglutide; and insulin glargine. They then were followed, and the primary endpoint was how long it took for that combination therapy to fail. The definition of failing was an A1c ≥ 7%.
Then, if the A1c rose to > 7.5%, they were continued on what they were on, and basal
Medscape Diabetes © 2021 WebMD, LLC
Any views expressed above are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the views of WebMD or Medscape.
Cite this: Anne L. Peters. Metformin, Then What? More Findings From the GRADE Study - Medscape - Nov 03, 2021.
Tables
Authors and Disclosures
Authors and Disclosures
Author(s)
Anne L. Peters, MD
Professor, Department of Clinical Medicine, Keck School of Medicine; Director, USC Westside Center for Diabetes, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
Disclosure: Anne L. Peters, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Serve(d) on the advisory board for: Abbott Diabetes Care; Becton Dickinson; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Livongo; Medscape; Merck & Co., Inc.; Novo Nordisk; Omada Health; OptumHealth; sanofi; Zafgen
Received research support from: Dexcom; MannKind Corporation; AstraZeneca
Serve(d) as a member of a speakers bureau for: Novo Nordisk