National guidelines failed to classify many younger African-American lung cancer patients as being eligible for lung cancer screening in a recent retrospective study, the lead author reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians.
The finding highlights a health disparity issue that may be addressed through an update of those guidelines that is in the works, said Carol Velez Martinez, MD, a third-year internal medicine resident at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport, La.
About one-third of the lung cancer patients in the retrospective cohort study were diagnosed before the age of 55 years, which means they would not have been recommended for screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) based on the 2013 lung cancer guidelines from the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), said Velez Martinez.
By contrast, 12.5% of screening-ineligible patients would have been counted as LDCT eligible based on guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Velez Martinez and coauthors found in their analysis.
In a draft recommendation statement posted July 7, the USPSTF said they would now recommend that screening at age 50 years, rather than 55, and that the pack-years of smoking history that would make an individual eligible for screening would be dropped from 30 pack-years to 20, changes that task force members said would be more inclusive of African Americans and women.
Velez Martinez said she is looking forward to a formal recommendation from USPSTF soon: "I'm hoping that's where they're heading," she said in an interview. "When I'm in practice as a resident, I actually bring it up to my patients, and if I have to call the insurance I don't have a problem — but I still have to call them because they're still going by the prior guidelines."
These findings suggest a need for further research to identify other gaps in lung cancer screening that may stem from race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status, said Alberto Revelo, MD, an interventional pulmonologist at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center in Columbus.
"I think there are going to be a lot of other health disparities," Revelo said in an interview. "[Velez Martinez's] study was limited by the fact that she cared mostly for Caucasians and also African Americans, but maybe no Latinos or Hispanics that I'm sure would also be affected if we were looking to that in a bigger or national study."
The 2013 USPSTF guidelines were based on benefits observed in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), which indicated a 20% relative risk reduction in death from lung cancer; however, the generalizability of the study beyond White males has been questioned, said Velez Martinez in a presentation at the CHEST annual meeting.
About 90% of NSLT participants were White and 59% were male, according to results published in 2011.
Other studies have shown that African Americans are more likely to get lung cancer than Whites, despite comparable smoking rates between the races, and that African American men are more likely to die from lung cancer than White men, Velez Martinez said. Many African Americans live below the poverty line, which means they have limited resources for insurance and health providers, and they also participate less often in clinical trials, she added.
In their retrospective observational cohort study, Velez Martinez and coinvestigators reviewed 1,500 medical records of patients with newly diagnosed stage 1–4 lung cancers from the LSU Health Science Center Shreveport between 2011 and 2015.
They found that 33% of those lung cancer patients were diagnosed before the age of 55 years, meaning they did not meet the 2013 USPSTF screening guidelines, which recommend annual LDCT in adults aged 55–80 years with a 30 pack-year smoking history who currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years.
Next, they sought to classify those screening-ineligible patients based on NCCN guidelines, which recommend LDCT in patients 50 years of age or older with at least a 20 pack-year smoking history and a 6-year risk of lung cancer of at least 1.3% based on the Tammemagi lung cancer risk calculator. The Tammemagi calculator considers factors such as age, education, body mass index, prior lung disease, familial cancer history, race and ethnicity, and smoking history.
After applying the risk stratification, the investigators found that 12.5% of these patients would have been categorized as high risk and therefore recommended for LDCT, and of that group, more than 65% were African American, Velez Martinez reported.
Revelo, who chaired the CHEST session where the findings were reported, said that shared decision-making will still be as important regardless of any changes to lung screening guidelines given the recognized potential harms of LDCT screening, such as false positives, radiation exposure, and psychological distress.
"I think we will continue to have a very personal conversation and make important decisions focused on what the patient wants," he said.
Authors reported no disclosures.
CHEST 2020: American College of Chest Physicians Annual Meeting.
This article originally appeared on MDEdge.com.
Follow Medscape on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube
Medscape Medical News © 2020
Cite this: High-risk Blacks Missed by Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines - Medscape - Oct 20, 2020.
Comments